GET THE APP

Presenting Symptoms, Vaccination Status and Association Comorbidities in Confirmed Cases of COVID-19 in King Salman Army Forces Hospital North West Region, Tabuk City KSA
Logo

(IJMRHS)
Indexed in: ESCI (Thomson Reuters)

Research - ( 2022) Volume 11, Issue 6

Presenting Symptoms, Vaccination Status and Association Comorbidities in Confirmed Cases of COVID-19 in King Salman Army Forces Hospital North West Region, Tabuk City KSA

 
1Department of Family Medicine, King Salman Armed Forces Hospital, Tabuk, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
 
*Corresponding Author:
Sarah Almutairi, Department of Family Medicine, King Salman Armed Forces Hospital, Tabuk, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Email: sara.f.mutairi@gmail.com

Received: 29-May-2022, Manuscript No. ijmrhs-22-65307; Editor assigned: 30-May-2022, Pre QC No. ijmrhs-22-65307 (PQ); Reviewed: 14-Jun-2022, QC No. ijmrhs-22-65307 (Q); Revised: 14-Jun-2022, Manuscript No. ijmrhs-22-65307 (R); Published: 30-Jun-2022

Abstract

Background: Most commonly reported symptoms for COVID-19 patients are anosmia, dysgeusia, cough, myalgias, and headache, with no specific clinical features that can reliably distinguish COVID-19 from other respiratory infections. Objectives: To describe the most frequent presenting symptoms of COVID-19, guide case suspicion, based on clinical manifestations, and characterize case severity. Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective descriptive hospital-based research design conducted at the Armed Forces Hospitals, Northwestern Region, in Tabuk City, Saudi Arabia among all adult patients aged ≥ 18 years who were admitted as confirmed cases of COVID-19. A data collection sheet was utilized including patients’ demographic data, presenting symptom(s) and their severity, vaccination status, and a history of recent contact with any confirmed case. Results: A total of 300 patients with confirmed COVID-19 were included. Their age ranged from 18 and 85 years. Equally were distributed between males and females. History of travel in the last 14 days was mentioned by 9.7% of them while 71.3% reported contact with confirmed cases. Cough was the commonest reported symptom (49.3%), followed by fever (44%), headache (36.7%), sore throat (28.7%), and running nose (22%). Regarding vaccinated cases, the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine ranked first (66%), followed by the AstraZeneca Oxford vaccine (23.9%) and both vaccines (8.1%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that patients who received a second dose of Pfizer-BioNTech or AstraZeneca Oxford vaccines were at lower risk for developing moderate/severe symptoms than those who received one dose, p=0.001 and 0.008; respectively. Conclusion: Most cases of confirmed COVID-19 infection were mild. The vast majority of the participants had received the COVID-19 vaccine. Of them, the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine ranked first, followed by the AstraZeneca Oxford vaccine and both vaccines. Patients who received a second dose of either AstraZeneca Oxford or Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines were at lower risk for developing moderate/severe symptoms than those who received one dose.

Keywords

COVID-19, Confirmed cases, Vaccines, Presenting symptoms, Severity

Introduction

The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an emerging respiratory viral infection, caused by the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) [1]. This disease was first reported in Wuhan City, Hubei Province (China) on December 13th, 2019 and was officially considered a pandemic by the World Health Organization in March 2020 [2]. In Saudi Arabia, the first confirmed case was reported on March 2nd, 2020 [3].

COVID-19 showed high rates of transmission. As of October 24th, 2021, the Worldometer reported 259,731,904 confirmed cases and 5,192,249 deaths worldwide, i.e., a 2% case fatality rate. In Saudi Arabia, there have been 549,590 confirmed cases, and 8,828 deaths, i.e., a 1.6% case fatality rate [4].

Several studies reported that several COVID-19 patients developed anosmia, or dysgeusia, suggesting that this symptom could be used as a screening tool to identify people with potential mild cases who could be recommended to self-isolate [5]. Also, other symptoms, (e.g., cough, myalgias, and headache) were most commonly reported. However, these symptoms may not be present, thus hindering case definition [6]. Moreover, other features including nausea, diarrhea, and sore throat were also well described [7,8]. Serious manifestations of infection include fever, cough, dyspnea, and infiltrates on chest imaging. Therefore, it has been concluded that there are no specific clinical features that can reliably distinguish COVID-19 from other viral respiratory infections [9].

The spectrum of symptomatic infection ranges from mild to critical; most infections are not severe [10-12]. Therefore, healthcare services should use a sensitive case definition, to adopt appropriate surveillance, prevention, and treatment actions [6]. In suspected cases, based on clinical symptoms and signs or previous contact with confirmed COVID-19 cases, it is recommended to use Real-Time Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) to confirm the diagnosis [13].

Zitek noted that diagnostic tests are intended to be used at specific times of infection and, depending on the stage of the disease, may not be very accurate [14]. Therefore, assessing clinical signs and self-reported symptoms shown by infected people can help establish the healthcare flow and indicate the need to perform confirmatory tests [15]. Canas, et al. added that early reported symptoms allow timely self-isolation, urgent testing and management, and consequently better outcome [16].

The present study aims to describe the most commonly presenting symptoms of confirmed COVID-19 cases to guide case suspicion, based on clinical manifestations, characterize case severity, and addition to identify the detailed vaccination status of confirmed cases of COVID-19.

Subjects and Methods

This is a single-center study followed by a retrospective descriptive hospital-based research design conducted at the Armed Forces Hospitals, Northwestern Region, in Tabuk City, Saudi Arabia.

The study population includes all confirmed cases of COVID-19, who were admitted to the Armed Forces Hospital, Northwestern Region in Tabuk City during the period from March 2021 till November 2021. The minimum sample size was calculated according to Dahiru, et al., and correction for the population of the study, with a confidence level of 95% and p-value of 50%, the sample size accounted for 384 [17]. However, the sample size was increased to at least 400 patients to compensate for missing data.

The study included adult patients aged ≥ 18 years presenting to the study setting who proved by RT-PCR to have COVID-19 infection. Children are aged <18 years and those who were not confirmed to have COVID-19 were excluded from the study.

A data collection sheet has been designed and adapted from a previously published research work [18]. It included demographic data (age, gender, educational level, occupation, residence, smoking status, travel status in the last 14 days, and body mass index), presenting symptom(s) (no symptoms, fever, chills, cough, difficulty of breathing (dyspnea), running nose, sneezing, loss of smell, loss of taste, headache, muscle ache, sore throat, malaise, nausea and vomiting, and diarrhea), vaccination status (If yes, BNT162b2 mRNA (Pfizer-BioNTech) and/or ChAdOx1 nCoV19 adenoviral (Oxford-AstraZeneca) vaccines, comorbidities (diabetes, hypertension, heart disease, asthma, chronic lung disease, hematological disease, stroke, viral hepatitis B or C, liver cirrhosis, cancer, or others), and severity of symptom(s) (patients with COVID-19 were grouped according to the NIH into the following severity of illness categories [19]:

Asymptomatic

Individuals who test positive for SARS-CoV-2 using a virologic test or an antigen test but who have no symptoms that are consistent with COVID-19.

Mild

Individuals who have any of the various signs and symptoms of COVID-19 (e.g., fever, cough, sore throat, malaise, headache, muscle pain, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, loss of taste and smell) but who do not have shortness of breath, dyspnea, or abnormal chest imaging.

Moderate

Individuals who show evidence of lower respiratory disease during clinical assessment or imaging and who have an oxygen saturation (SpO2) ≥ 94% on room air at sea level.

Severe

Individuals who have SpO2 <94% on room air at sea level, a ratio of arterial partial pressure of oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) <300 mm Hg, a respiratory rate >30 breaths/min, or lung infiltrates >50%.

Critical

Individuals who have respiratory failure, septic shock, and/or multiple organ dysfunction. In addition to the history of recent contact with a confirmed case.

After obtaining all the necessary official approvals, data of all registered patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were retrieved and recorded into an Excel sheet.

Collected data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (IBM, SPSS version 26). Descriptive statistics (frequency and percentage for categorical variables and mean and standard deviation for quantitative variables) were calculated. Tests of significance, (i.e., chi-square and Fischer exact tests for categorical variables) were applied to identify significant presenting symptoms associated with the severity of positive PCR results. Binary logistic regression was applied to design an equation for predictors of severity of a symptom of COVID-19. p-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Demographic and Personal Characteristics

A total of 300 patients with confirmed COVID-19 were included in the study. Table 1 presents their demographic and personal characteristics. There are ranges between 18 and 85 years with a mean ± Standard Deviation (SD) of ± 11.9 years. Equally were distributed between males and females. Almost two-thirds (69.3%) were married and among married females, 5.8% were pregnant. Half of them were university graduates. Regarding their occupation, 33% were military persons whereas 34.7% were unemployed. The vast majority (99%) live in urban areas. Smoking was reported by 24.3% of them. History of travel in the last 14 days was mentioned by 9.7% of patients while most of them (71.3%) reported contact with confirmed cases.

Table 1. Demographic and personal characteristics of confirmed cases of COVID-19 admitted at Armed Forces Hospital, Northwestern Region in Tabuk City (March 2021-November 2021).

Variables Frequency Percentage
Age in years
18-40 217 72.3
41-60 74 24.7
>60 9 3
Range 18-85
Mean ± SD 34.8 ± 11.9
Gender
Male 150 50
Female 150 50
Marital status
Nor married 92 30.7
Married 208 69.3
Pregnancy* (n=104)
No 98 94.2
Yes 6 5.8
Educational level
Illiterate 8 2.7
Primary school 16 5.3
Intermediate school 14 4.7
Secondary school 108 36
University 150 50
Postgraduate 4 1.3
Occupation
Unemployed 104 34.7
Teacher 25 8.3
Administrative 5 1.7
Healthcare worker 15 5
Military 99 33
Others 52 17.3
Residence
Urban 297 99
Rural 3 1
Smoking status
Non smoker 227 75.7
Smoker 73 24.3
Travel status in the last 14 days
No 271 90.3
Yes 29 9.7
Contact with a confirmed case
No 86 28.7
Yes 214 71.3
*For married females

Most of the confirmed COVID-19 cases were either overweight (37.5%) or obese (28.7%) as seen in Figure 1.

Ijmrhs-mass

Figure 1. Body mass index of confirmed COVID-19 cases admitted at Armed Forces Hospital, northwestern region in tabuk city (March 2021-November 2021)

Presenting Symptoms

Figure 2 summarizes the presenting symptoms among confirmed COVID-19 cases. Cough was the commonest reported symptom (49.3%), followed by fever (44%), headache (36.7%), sore throat (28.7%), and running nose (22%). Minorities reported gastrointestinal symptoms such as diarrhea (2.7%) and nausea/vomiting (2.3%).

Ijmrhs-symptoms

Figure 2. Presenting symptoms of confirmed COVID-19 cases admitted at Armed Forces Hospital, northwestern region in tabuk city (March 2021-November 2021)

Comorbidities

It is realized from Figure 3 that diabetes (7.3%), hypertension (6.3%), and bronchial asthma (3.7%) were the commonest reported comorbidities among COVID-19 cases. Overall, 14% of patients had co-morbid diseases.

Ijmrhs-tabuk

Figure 3. Comorbidities associated with COVID-19 among confirmed cases admitted at Armed Forces Hospital, northwestern region in tabuk city (March 2021-November 2021)

Vaccination Status

Among cases with valid information about vaccination status (n=285), the majority (97.9%) had the COVID-19 vaccine as illustrated in Figure 4. In vaccinated cases, the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine ranked first (66%), followed by the AstraZeneca Oxford vaccine (23.9%) and both vaccines (8.1%) (Table 2).

Ijmrhs-northwestern

Figure 4. Vaccination status of COVID-19 confirmed cases admitted at Armed Forces Hospital, northwestern region in tabuk city (March 2021-November 2021) “N=285”

Table 2. Details of the vaccination status of COVID-19 confirmed cases admitted at Armed Forces Hospital, northwestern region in tabuk City (March 2021-November 2021) “N=285”

  Frequency Percentage
Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine 188 66
One dose 102 54.3
Two doses 79 42
Three doses 7 3.7
AstraZeneca Oxford vaccine 68 23.9
One dose 56 82.4
Two doses 12 17.6
Both 23 8.1

Severity of COVID-19 Symptoms

As shown in Figure 5, in 61.7% of cases, the symptoms were mild while moderately severe cases were observed in 38% of cases and one case was described as severe and died.

Ijmrhs-COVID-19

Figure 5. Severity of COVID-19 symptoms among the confirmed cases, Armed Forces Hospital, northwestern region in tabuk city (March 2021-November 2021)

Moderate/severe cases were more likely to affect older patients (aged over 60 years) than younger patients (18-40 years) (77.8% vs. 35%), p=0.021. Teachers and administrators had the highest rate of moderate/severe symptoms (60%) whereas military persons (37.4%) and others (15.4%) had the lowest rates, p=0.002. All rural residents compared to only 37.7% of urban residents had moderate/severe symptoms, however, this difference was borderline statistically insignificant (p=0.055). Overweight patients had the highest rate of moderate/severe symptoms (48.2%) while underweight subjects had the lowest rate (25%), p=0.025. More than half (58.1%) of patients with no history of contact with confirmed cases compared to 30.4% of those who reported such history had moderate/severe symptoms, p<0.001. All cases with a history of heart disease compared to only 37.7% of those without such history had moderate/ severe symptoms, however, this difference was borderline statistically insignificant (p=0.055). Cases who received the COVID-19 vaccine were less likely to have moderate/severe symptoms compared to their peers (36.9% vs. 83.3%), p=0.031. Moderate/severe symptoms were less likely to occur with the AstraZeneca Oxford vaccine compared to the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine (25% vs. 36.9%), p=0.028. Cases that received one dose of either AstraZeneca Oxford or Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines were less likely to have moderate/severe symptoms compared to those that received more vaccine doses, p=0.003 and <0.001, respectively (Table 3).

Table 3. Factors associated with severity of COVID-19 symptoms

COVID-19 severity p-value
Mild Moderate to severe
N=185 N (%) N=115 N (%)
Age in years
18-40 (n=217) 141 (65.0) 76 (35.0) 0.021*
41-60 (n=74) 42 (56.8) 32 (43.2)
>60 (n=9) 2 (22.2) 7 (77.8)
Gender
Male (n=150) 95 (63.3) 55 (36.7) 0.553*
Female (n=150) 90 (60.0) 60 (40.0)
Marital status
Nor married (n=92) 57 (62.0) 35 (38.0) 0.945*
Married (n=208) 128 (61.5) 80 (38.5)
Pregnancy* (n=104)
No (n=98) 60 (61.2) 38 (38.8) 0.577**
Yes (n=6) 4 (66.7) 2 (33.3)
Educational level
Illiterate (n=8) 3 (37.5) 5 (62.5) 0.167*
Primary school (n=16) 8 (50.0) 8 (50.0)
Intermediate school (n=14) 11 (78.6) 3 (21.4)
Secondary school (n=108) 74 (68.5) 34 (31.5)
University (n=150) 87 (58.0) 63 (42.0)
Postgraduate (n=4) 2 (50.0) 2 (50.0)
Occupation
Unemployed (n=104) 59 (56.7) 45 (43.3) 0.002*
Teacher (n=25) 10 (40.0) 15 (60.0)
Administrative (n=5) 2 (40.0) 3 (60.0)
Healthcare worker (n=15) 8 (53.3) 7 (46.7)
Military (n=99) 62 (62.6) 37 (37.4)
Others (n=52) 44 (84.6) 8 (15.4)
Residence
Urban (n=297) 185 (62.3) 112 (37.7) 0.055**
Rural (n=3) 0 (0.0) 3 (100)
Body mass index
Underweight (n=12) 9 (75.0) 3 (25.0) 0.025*
Normal (n=87) 57 (65.5) 30 (34.5)
Overweight (n=110) 57 (51.8) 53 (48.2)
Obese (n=84) 60 (71.4) 24 (28.6)
Smoking status
Non-smoker (n=227) 140 (61.7) 87 (38.3) 0.996*
Smoker (n=73) 45 (61.6) 28 (38.4)
Travel status in last 14 days
No (n=271) 163 (60.1) 108 (39.9)
Yes (n=29) 22 (75.9) 7 (24.1) 0.098*
Contact with a confirmed case
No (n=86) 36 (41.9) 50 (58.1) <0.001*
Yes (n=214) 149 (69.6) 65 (30.4)
Diabetes mellitus
No (n=278) 176 (62.2) 105 (37.8) 0.475*
Yes (n=22) 12 (54.5) 10 (45.5)
Hypertension
No (n=281) 177 (63.0) 104 (37.0) 0.070*
Yes (n=19) 8 (42.1) 11 (57.9)
Bronchial asthma
No (n=289) 180 (62.3) 109 (37.7) 0.260*
Yes (n=11) 5 (45.5) 6 (54.5)
Heart diseases
No (n=297) 185 (62.3) 112 (37.7) 0.055**
Yes (n=3) 0 (0.0) 3 (100)
COVID-19 vaccination (n=285)
No (n=6) 1 (16.7) 5 (83.3) 0.031**
Yes (279) 176 (63.1) 103 (36.9)
Type of vaccine (n=279)
Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine (n=188) 113 (60.1) 75 (36.9) 0.028*
AstraZeneca Oxford vaccine (n=68) 51 (75.0) 17 (25.0)
Both (n=23) 11 (47.8) 12 (25.2)
Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine
One dose (n=102) 87 (85.3) 15 (14.7) <0.001
Two doses (n=79) 25(31.6) 54 (68.4)
Three doses (n=7) 1 (14.3) 6 (85.7)
AstraZeneca Oxford vaccine
One dose (n=56) 46 (82.1) 10 (17.9) 0.003
Two doses (n=12) 5 (41.7) 7 (58.3)
*Chi-square test; **Fischer Exact test

Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that patients who received a second dose of Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine were at lower risk for developing moderate/severe symptoms than those who received one dose (Adjusted Odds Ratio “AOR”=0.03, 95% Confidence Interval “CI”: 0.001-0.24), p=0.001. Similarly, patients who received a second dose of the AstraZeneca Oxford vaccine were at lower risk for developing moderate/severe symptoms than those who received one dose (AOR=0.16, 95% CI: 0.04-0.62), p=0.008. History of vaccination, type of the vaccine, history of contact with a confirmed case, occupation, body mass index, and age was not significantly associated with COVID-19 symptoms` severity after controlling for confounding effect (Table 4).

Table 4. Predictors of severity of COVID-19 symptoms among confirmed cases: multivariate logistic regression analysis

B SE AOR 95% CI p-value
Type of vaccine
No 1 ---
Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine -1.455 1.229 0.23 0.02-2.60 0.236
AstraZeneca Oxford vaccine -1.705 1.158 0.18 0.02-1.76 0.141
Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine
One dose 1 ---
Two doses -3.619 1.118 0.03 0.001-0.24 0.001
Three doses -1.099 1.108 0.33 0.04-2.92 0.321
AstraZeneca Oxford vaccine
One dose 1 1
Two doses *1.818 0.682 0.16 0.04-0.62 0.008
B: Slope; SE: Standard Error; AOR: Adjusted Odds Ratio; CI: Confidence Interval
Terms of vaccination, contact with a confirmed case, occupation, body mass index, and age were removed from the final model

Discussion

In the current study, the most frequently reported presenting symptoms among confirmed COVID-19 cases were cough, fever, headache, sore throat, and running nose. However, minorities reported gastrointestinal symptoms such as diarrhea and nausea/vomiting as well as loss of taste and loss of smell. Iser, et al., in their narrative review, reported that the commonly reported clinical spectrum of COVID-19 among Brazilians was fever, cough, and dyspnea [6]. Moreover, gastrointestinal symptoms and dysgeusia or anosmia have been reported in mild cases, while dyspnea was frequent in severe and fatal cases. In Myanmar, fever, cough, and loss of smell were the most common symptoms [18]. However, numerous studies reported that the commonest presenting symptoms of COVID-19 infection were sore throat, fatigue, shortness of breath, and rhinorrhea [20-24]. Zahra, et al. reported in their systematic review that symptoms of anosmia and dysgeusia were frequently reported by COVID-19-positive patients; particularly females and younger patients [2]. Variation in the presenting symptoms between various studies carried out in different geographical areas could be related to genetic predisposition as well as cultural factors [24].

In the present study and following others, there was no gender difference regarding the severity of COVID-19 symptoms [25,26]. However, some others reported female predominance in studies carried out in China, the USA, and Germany while others reported male predominance in studies carried out in Thailand, Singapore, and China [18,20,21,27-29].

In the current study, diabetes, hypertension, and bronchial asthma were the commonest reported comorbidities among COVID-19 confirmed cases and overall, 14% of patients had co-morbid diseases. Higher rates were reported in studies carried out in Myanmar (37.8), Thailand (25.0%), and Singapore (28.3%) [18,21,28]. However, a comparable figure was observed in a study carried out in China (15.8%) [25]. This variation between studies could be explained by differences between them in the prevalence of chronic diseases across age, gender distribution, as well as geographic area.

In line with the present study, numerous studies revealed that hypertension and diabetes mellitus were the commonest reported co-morbid diseases in COVID-19 patients [18,24,25,27,29,34].

In the present study, 61.7% of cases were regarded as mild while 38% were regarded as moderate and only one case was described as severe and died. Usually, the high rate of asymptomatic or mild cases is a reflection of good practice in case finding, tracing of close contact as well as massive surveillance of suspected COVID-19 cases [18]. However, on the other hand, having a high rate of asymptomatic or mild cases might help in the rapid spread of infection [30].

In a univariate analysis in this study, older patients were more likely to have moderate/severe symptoms. However, after controlling for the confounders in multivariate logistic regression analysis, this effect disappeared. The association between the severity of COVID-19 symptoms and older age has been observed in several studies [18,20,21,25,27]. The disappearance of the association between older age and severity of COVID-19 symptoms in multivariate analysis in this study could be attributed to the effect of COVID-19 vaccination which was not included in other studies, which could upper-handed the effect of other factors including older age.

In the univariate analysis and line with other studies carried out in Thailand, Germany, and China, overweight patients were more likely to have moderate/severe symptoms [21,22,27]. However, after controlling for the confounders in multivariate logistic regression analysis, this effect disappeared in the present study.

Also, in univariate analysis, cases who received the COVID-19 vaccine were less likely to have moderate/severe symptoms compared to their peers. However, after controlling for the confounders in multivariate logistic regression analysis, this effect disappeared. The vast majority of the participants in this study had received the COVID-19 vaccine (97.9%). Of them, the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine ranked first (66%), followed by the AstraZeneca Oxford vaccine (23.9%) and both vaccines (8.1%). Even after controlling for the effect of confounding in the present study, patients who received a second dose of either AstraZeneca Oxford or Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines were at lower risk for developing moderate/severe symptoms than those who received one dose. Hall V, et al. observed that two doses of Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine were associated with high protection against COVID-19 infection; however, this protection was short-term as it is reduced considerably after 6 months. However, infection-acquired immunity accompanied by vaccination remained high for more than a year after infection [31]. Also, Antonelli M, et al. concluded that the rate and severity of COVID-19 infection reduced; particularly in elderly patients after first or second COVID-19 vaccinations with Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2), ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, or mRNA-1273 [32]. Additionally, numerous studies confirmed that nearly all individual symptoms of COVID-19 were less frequent in vaccinated versus unvaccinated patients, and more patients in the vaccinated than in the unvaccinated groups were asymptomatic [33-38].

The present study has some limitations that should be mentioned. First of all, because of the retrospective observational design of the present study, it was subjected to selection bias. Second, because the fact that this study was carried out in only one center, the generalizability of findings over other health care facilities is questionable. Third, some hematological and biochemical markers like hemoglobin level, white blood cell count, C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, D-dimer, alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST and prothrombin time that might influence the severity of disease were not investigated in this study.

Conclusion

In conclusion, most cases of confirmed COVID-19 infection were mild. The most frequently reported presenting symptoms among them were cough, fever, headache, sore throat, and running nose. The vast majority of the participants in this study had received the COVID-19 vaccine. Of them, the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine ranked first, followed by the AstraZeneca Oxford vaccine and both vaccines. Patients who received a second dose of either AstraZeneca Oxford or Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines were at lower risk for developing moderate/severe symptoms than those who received one dose. Based on the present study`s findings, we recommended vaccination of people with second and booster doses of the vaccine, particularly in more vulnerable groups. We also recommended carrying out a further longitudinal study with a large sample size to achieve a higher strength of association between various factors and the severity of COVID-19 infection.

Declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language

Archive
Scope Categories
  • Clinical Research
  • Epidemiology
  • Oncology
  • Biomedicine
  • Dentistry
  • Medical Education
  • Physiotherapy
  • Pulmonology
  • Nephrology
  • Gynaecology
  • Dermatology
  • Dermatoepidemiology
  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Ophthalmology
  • Sexology
  • Osteology
  • Kinesiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Haematology
  • Psychology
  • Paediatrics
  • Angiology/Vascular Medicine
  • Critical care Medicine
  • Cardiology
  • Endocrinology
  • Gastroenterology
  • Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology
  • Hepatology
  • Geriatric Medicine
  • Bariatrics
  • Pharmacy and Nursing
  • Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry
  • Radiobiology
  • Pharmacology
  • Toxicology
  • Clinical immunology
  • Clinical and Hospital Pharmacy
  • Cell Biology
  • Genomics and Proteomics
  • Pharmacogenomics
  • Bioinformatics and Biotechnology